These days, the importance of thorough adverse media screening can’t be overstated. Unfortunately, this crucial process is often hampered by the high incidence of false positives, especially in ongoing screening scenarios.
False Positives in Continuous Screening
Traditionally, adverse media screening has been a staple during client onboarding but has seen less emphasis in continuous monitoring. The primary challenge? The overwhelming number of alerts and false positives that emerge. This has led many institutions to sidestep ongoing screening, leaving potential risks unchecked.
Before we explore the latest technical innovations, let’s delve into some common challenges experienced with adverse media screening as it relates to the management of false positives.
Common Challenges in Dealing with False Positives
- Filtering Out the Noise:
Analysts often struggle to filter relevant information from vast data pools, especially when common names generate millions of search results. Misattributions based on proximity or phrasing in articles can lead to false positives, making it difficult to distinguish actual involvement from mere mentions. - Screening Against Irrelevant Media:
Businesses must align screening efforts with specific risks relevant to their industry. For instance, financial institutions focus on fraud and money laundering, while manufacturers prioritize corruption and environmental violations. - Inconsistent Scoring Mechanisms:
Unlike credit scoring, adverse media lacks standardized metrics. The subjective nature of evaluations can lead to inconsistent risk assessments, making a uniform scoring approach essential for accuracy. - Persistent Article Flagging:
Alerts for every new article, rather than meaningful updates, overwhelm analysts and lead to alert fatigue. A smarter, targeted alert system is needed to focus resources on critical changes. - Prove and Disprove Challenges:
Disproving allegations is often more complex than confirming them, requiring extensive evidence. Incorrect reports can cause significant reputational damage, making accurate, fair assessments crucial.
How AI Can Revolutionize Adverse Media Screening
AI and Machine Learning are transforming adverse media screening by offering precise, efficient solutions to the challenges of false positives and information overload.
- Entity Identification:
NGA’s use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) ensures accurate identification and categorization of entities, minimizing errors in complex texts. - Advanced Categorization:
By tagging individual sentences rather than entire articles, NGA aligns with FATF guidelines and tailors screenings to specific risks, improving review speeds and relevance. - COMFORT™ Scoring and Contextual Analysis:
NGA’s patented COMFORT™ score evaluates factors such as frequency, severity, and credibility of negative mentions, helping distinguish high-risk entities and reduce false positives. - Re-Flag Suppression:
Suppressing repetitive alerts unless there’s a significant change in an entity’s risk profile enhances efficiency and reduces analyst fatigue. - Prove and Disprove Mechanisms:
NGA highlights evidence of exoneration, ensuring balanced assessments and mitigating the impact of initial negative impressions.
How to Access NGA’s Screening Tools
NGA offers adaptable adverse media screening solutions through:
- Real-time APIs
- A user-friendly web-based SaaS platform
- Batch and ongoing screening options
These tools are designed to cater to client-specific risks and reduce false positives, providing precise and reliable media research capabilities.
CONTACT US for a free consultation.