COMFORT™ reads adverse media at sentence level, weighs the frequency, severity and credibility of every negative mention, and turns millions of articles into one auditable 0–100 risk score.
Prosecutors named InnovaSys Holdings in a tender inquiry opened this week.
The company said it is cooperating fully with investigators.
An earlier matter against the firm was withdrawn in March.
Most screening systems score at article level: if a name appears anywhere near a risky word, the whole article is flagged and an analyst reads all of it. That is where false positives come from.
COMFORT™ reads the individual sentences. It extracts the exact sentences that implicate an entity as evidence, keeps neutral context out of the score, and recognises probable absolution, so a withdrawn charge counts in the entity's favour rather than against it. The result is a score that rates real risk, not keyword noise.
See it inside Adverse Media Screening →InnovaSys Holdings is named in a provincial tender inquiry.
Several unrelated firms are mentioned in the same report.
A previous matter against the company was dismissed.
InnovaSys Holdings is named in a provincial tender inquiry.
Implicating · scoredSeveral unrelated firms are mentioned in the same report.
Not relevant · excludedA previous matter against the company was dismissed.
Absolution · counts in favourEvidence flows in. One contextual score comes out, with the detail preserved behind it.
Every negative mention is weighed on three dimensions: how often it recurs across independent coverage, how severe the alleged conduct is, and how credible the source reporting it is.
Authenticity and relevance weighting means a passing mention in an aggregator does not count like an investigation in a major daily, and one story syndicated fifty times does not read as fifty stories. The three signals combine into a single 0–100 score for the entity, with the detail preserved underneath it.
The COMFORT™ Score is not a black box. Every contributing factor, from the severity of each finding to the exact mitigating circumstances considered, is documented alongside the score. Your team always knows exactly why a score is what it is.
“Every score includes clear justification, sources, and reasoning — perfect for internal reviews, audits, or regulator questions.”
Four credible, direct articles implicate the entity in procurement irregularities between 2023 and 2025. High materiality: direct accusation, confirmed recency.
The parent company carries an existing HIGH rating. Network contamination applied: parent risk elevates the subject entity per methodology.
Jurisdiction risk factor applied at standard weighting per the country risk model, incorporating FATF and NRA assessments.
No matches found across OFAC, UN, EU, UK HMT, FIC and 12 additional databases. Confidence: very high.
No completed prosecutions or regulatory enforcement actions found. Reduces the score marginally per the mitigating-circumstances framework.
A score you cannot evidence is a score you cannot defend. Every COMFORT™ score is source-cited and carries a full audit trail, so a reviewer can walk backwards from the decision to the exact sentence and publication behind it.
The publication is identified and weighted for authenticity and relevance.
The exact implicating sentences are extracted and cited as evidence.
The signals combine into one 0–100 score with per-category detail.
A source-cited, audit-ready report stands behind the call you make.
AML, compliance and due diligence teams face growing pressure: more entities to screen, stricter regulations, limited headcount. The COMFORT™ Score was built to solve this exactly.
The same COMFORT™ technology scores adverse media everywhere HLBNGA screens, so a score means the same thing in every product.
Contextual screening of global news, scored and ranked.
Explore →Instant single-search due diligence with scored results.
Explore →Continuous monitoring with alerts when scores move.
Explore →AI-built EDD reports with COMFORT™ ratings throughout.
Explore →Bring a name to a demo and see the score, the evidence and the audit trail built in front of you.